Minerva Resources
Minera IRL

Find out more about Subscribing Companies
Unique access to energy
investors. Global distribution
of company news.
Find out more.
Sign up for our free weekly newsletter
Informed comment and independent news delivered
by email every week.
Sign up here.
Find out more about Minesite Forums
Management and investors
are brought together at our
investor forums.
Find out more.
Bulletin Board
Join other informed investors.
Debate mining companies.
Visit Bulletin Boards.
OPUS Executive
An Insider's Guide to the Mining Sector, 2nd edition
Exchange Traded Gold
Bishopsgate Communications
T1ps Spreadbetting
Ian Plimer: Heaven and Earth
HighGrade.net
Commodity Watch Radio
Jobs4mining
Doug Casey Research
UNCTAD
Ocean Equities Ltd
Bullion Desk
allipo.com
Ambrian Capital

News


January 08, 2009

Capstone Mining Motors On In The Copper Space, With A Strong Hedge Book Driving The Engine


By Alastair Ford


Not too long after the closure of the merger deal between Capstone and Sherwood Copper at the back end of last year, Minesite took the opportunity to have a chat to Mark Patchett of Capstone to find out how it had all gone. The combination brings Capstone’s Cozamin mine in Mexico together with Sherwood’s Minto mine in the Yukon. Both assets are primary copper producers, but between them they now provide the new bigger, better Capstone with significant by-products in gold, silver, lead and zinc. And, get this - the combined Capstone has forward sold more than 120 million pounds of copper at an average price of US$2.56 per pound, a price which should ensure some robust-looking cash flow numbers during a time of supposed weakness in the copper mining business. Capstone’s own literature talks of that hedging as fuelling the company’s cash flow “engine”, and at a time when half the world’s miners are stalling and coming to a dead halt there are far worse positions to be in.

Lest anyone think that the new Capstone is so-called for anything other than pragmatic reasons, Mark Patchett is keen to point out otherwise. He emphasizes that the merger deal was done on as near enough equal terms as you can get, and says that the Capstone name was simply kept on because Capstone itself had, prior to the deal, a full listing on the Toronto exchange, while Sherwood was only listed on the Venture exchange. It’s not a simple matter merging two companies, even if the commercial...

Restricted Area

Please login or register (FREE, quick and easy) to read the full article.